Open curtischang2510 opened 1 week ago
We agree that it is a feature flaw since it is just to have a more informed message for the user.
We feel that it is very low since it is purely a GUI improvement since the error message already informs the user that changes has been reverted. And by adding what was changed is does the same thing as the current message but just makes it more specific what was changed
We feel that it is not in scope, since firstly in the DG our team did document how the undo
feature works as it saves the previous address book state. And by definition of the undo
function it does captures the changes made after executing a command. Secondly, we feel that if we were to add a specific message we will need to re-implement the back end for the undo
command because we will need to remember each individual command instead of the state of the address book.
Team chose [response.NotInScope
]
Reason for disagreement: I believe that their justification for why this issue is not in scope has some issues.
video:https://raw.githubusercontent.com/curtischang2510/pe/main/files/5b5e0957-7f12-4784-8671-f9a66c202cce.mov
Steps to reproduce: