Closed curtisullerich closed 11 years ago
I think this is what we should use:
Attribution-ShareAlike CC BY-SA
This license lets others remix, tweak, and build upon your work even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit you and license their new creations under the identical terms. This license is often compared to “copyleft” free and open source software licenses. All new works based on yours will carry the same license, so any derivatives will also allow commercial use. This is the license used by Wikipedia, and is recommended for materials that would benefit from incorporating content from Wikipedia and similarly licensed projects.
What about MIT?
Yes, MIT is fine.
No need to add notices to individual files, closing.
We need to slap an open source license on here. Creative Commons?