On the main lend/crvUSD UI when it calculates health it seems to call the health view method with full=True when the health is green (oracle price is >3 bands higher), and full=False when health is yellow (oracle price is <=3 bands higher). Is this the desired behavior? Just seems confusing for the user that their health evaporates for seemingly no reason.
Eg. for wstETH market with active band -65 and oracle price 4,391.15
1 wstETH collateral, 3660 debt: 7.71% health (green) - bands -61 to -52
1 wstETH collateral, 3670 debt: 7.42% health (green) - bands -61 to -52
1 wstETH collateral, 3680 debt: 4.23% health (yellow) - bands -62 to -53 (by my calcs I think it should be around ~7% with full=True)
I personally think it would be clearer to always call with full=True or full=False (with full=True as my preference). Changing the full parameter without telling the user why seems a bit misleading to me.
On the main lend/crvUSD UI when it calculates health it seems to call the
healthview method withfull=Truewhen the health is green (oracle price is >3 bands higher), andfull=Falsewhen health is yellow (oracle price is <=3 bands higher). Is this the desired behavior? Just seems confusing for the user that their health evaporates for seemingly no reason.Eg. for wstETH market with active band -65 and oracle price 4,391.15 1 wstETH collateral, 3660 debt: 7.71% health (green) - bands -61 to -52 1 wstETH collateral, 3670 debt: 7.42% health (green) - bands -61 to -52 1 wstETH collateral, 3680 debt: 4.23% health (yellow) - bands -62 to -53 (by my calcs I think it should be around ~7% with
full=True)I personally think it would be clearer to always call with
full=Trueorfull=False(withfull=Trueas my preference). Changing thefullparameter without telling the user why seems a bit misleading to me.What's everyone else think?