Open sveinse opened 1 month ago
For me personally it is not really an extra burden to use Zaptec integration via HACS, but I think that if the integration becomes part of HA OS it will work even more reliably than it is now. After all, your integration does not need HACS anymore.
would be nice, but even nicer if the load balancer would also be able to balance multiple chargers at once. I see the last commit there was more then 9 months ago :(
Currently the zaptec integration is distributed via the HACS framework.
Would it be interesting to have zaptec as an official HA integration? I'd like to hear from the people that are using the integration. Migrating the zaptec integration from a HACS installable integration into a official HA integration will require considerable efforts. There is no point in doing it unless there is a need and would benefit our users.
What do you think? Is using HACS for this repo a burden for making use of zaptec?
What are the addiotional efforts?
What are the addiotional efforts?
More info here: https://developers.home-assistant.io/docs/creating_component_code_review
It really not worth it imo
@sveinse Considering the huge amount of work that needs to be put into making the zaptec integration part of HA, I now also wonder if it is worth it. Will the adjustment and/or expansion of the integration remain as flexible as it is now, or will it become a sluggish process if it has to be approved by many collaborators first. Decisions, decisions, decisions.
Currently the zaptec integration is distributed via the HACS framework.
Would it be interesting to have zaptec as an official HA integration? I'd like to hear from the people that are using the integration. Migrating the zaptec integration from a HACS installable integration into a official HA integration will require considerable efforts. There is no point in doing it unless there is a need and would benefit our users.
What do you think? Is using HACS for this repo a burden for making use of zaptec?