I'm using your tool to estimate evaluation metrics for information retrieval research and I got a bit stuck with some behaviour, which doesn't look intuitive for me. Could you please help me to figure out what's going on?
Question:
Suppose I have a qrel file, where the grades are all integers and can take the values: {0, 1, 2, 3}. It's an initial qrel file for RelevanceEvaluator.
To evaluate the result I take another file where the grades are float and vary from 0 to 100 - [0, 100]. How does the RelevanceEvaluator behave in that case? Does it use any normalization?
I tried to relabel all {2, 3} values to {1} in the intial qrel file and initialized the RelevanceEvaluator with such a qrel file with binary grades. And nothing changed... Is it OK?
I used one more run-file for evaluation where grades are float and vary from 0 to 2 - [0, 2] and the results significantly changed with binary initial grades in comparison with {0, 1, 2, 3} initial grades. Why?
Dear developers,
I'm using your tool to estimate evaluation metrics for information retrieval research and I got a bit stuck with some behaviour, which doesn't look intuitive for me. Could you please help me to figure out what's going on?
Question: Suppose I have a qrel file, where the grades are all integers and can take the values: {0, 1, 2, 3}. It's an initial qrel file for
RelevanceEvaluator
.To evaluate the result I take another file where the grades are float and vary from 0 to 100 - [0, 100]. How does the
RelevanceEvaluator
behave in that case? Does it use any normalization?I tried to relabel all {2, 3} values to {1} in the intial qrel file and initialized the
RelevanceEvaluator
with such a qrel file with binary grades. And nothing changed... Is it OK?I used one more run-file for evaluation where grades are float and vary from 0 to 2 - [0, 2] and the results significantly changed with binary initial grades in comparison with {0, 1, 2, 3} initial grades. Why?
Thanks in advance.