Open qianyizhang opened 9 months ago
@qianyizhang , could you please describe a specific example? I don't remember that anybody has requested the feature. Please describe your data annotation task and how you annotate data at the moment.
@qianyizhang , could you please describe a specific example? I don't remember that anybody has requested the feature. Please describe your data annotation task and how you annotate data at the moment.
Hi, I am labeling lesions in medical images and there are many diagnostic attributes that can be grouped together, for instance:
The list can be long, and currently, I am using radio buttons for sub-attributes, which makes the interface overwhelmingly cluttered. The best practice is to have a multi-select combo box, which allows the annotator to focus on one category of attributes at a time.
@nmanovic any updates?
@nmanovic I am also interested in same feature. I am working on multi label classification with object detection task. It would be helpful if this feature is present. Multiple selection from list of values for an attribute would solve this.
Does it support selecting multiple values for an attribute now? Both radio
and select
can only select one value. I feel like there is something wrong with the implementation of radio
. radio
should be implemented to allow multiple values to be selected.
Actions before raising this issue
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Describe the solution you'd like
I have attributes that are designated with multiple labels. It would be nice to have a combo box that allows for the representation of these elements, enabling me to make multiple selections efficiently
Describe alternatives you've considered
Converting the attributes into a list with binary checkboxes could result in a cluttered interface, potentially impacting user experience due to the overwhelming number of options displayed.
The current attributes board lacks a grouping feature, which leads to a disorganized presentation that may hinder efficient attribute selection and management.
Additional context
No response