search

cvillaluz81 / bpbible

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bpbible
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Allow lookup of definitions and morphology without displaying links #230

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Why is this feature needed?
Strongs/lemma and morph links clutter up the window; scholars who know the 
biblical languages do not want such clutter.

What problem will it solve?
Window clutter.

Describe a typical usage of the feature:
Lookup of word definitions and parsings. 

Are you aware of any programs that have this feature or a similar feature?
BibleTime

Original issue reported on code.google.com by teconsul...@gmail.com on 25 Apr 2012 at 12:51

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Yep, I've thought of doing that before, just haven't quite got around to it 
yet. I'm looking at this now.

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 25 Apr 2012 at 6:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
I've done an initial cut in r1390 which just does it on hover, but it needs 
more work.

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 26 Apr 2012 at 1:05

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
You are my hero. That is great to hear. Perhaps next week I will see about 
testing and give you feedback.

Original comment by teconsul...@gmail.com on 26 Apr 2012 at 1:32

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Okay, r1392 includes a more polished form of this implementing click and hover 
properly. I'll leave this open a while longer, but it could be resolved in this 
state.

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 3 May 2012 at 2:03

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
r1395 handles highlighting other occurrences of the active strongs number.
This involves highlighting the current strongs number in inline mode, which we 
didn't do before.

I'll mark this issue as fixed. Feel free to add more to it if you want though.

Original comment by benpmor...@gmail.com on 3 May 2012 at 3:38

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
From the screenshots you sent, it looks great. I tried to test this in Windows, 
but I got an error message about wx.wc or something not being found (I forget 
the specifics). I got xulrunner to work, etc., but I was not able to get past 
that message. If it is an easy dependency issue, I can try again. But anyway, 
thanks for jumping on this.

Original comment by dcowen...@gmail.com on 4 May 2012 at 1:45

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by jonmmor...@gmail.com on 23 Apr 2013 at 11:17