Closed jh3141 closed 6 years ago
Thanks for reporting this issue. The first issue s a bug and has been fixed in version 0.95.
The second issue is a problem with your network (and possibly my docs). You need to have a routable IPv6 address on your LAN-side. You cannot use ULAs in conjunction with NAT64. The end-host stack will try to use IPv6 to get out to the internet, and since ULAs are not routable on the internet, it won't work.
NAT64 is a transition mechanism which allows one to create an IPv6-only network. But the assumption is that the IPv6-only network is using GUA (Globally Unique Address).
Ah, thanks for that. I assumed that while native IPv6 addresses would remain undeliverable that the mapped IPv4 addresses would be translated back to IPv4 packets for routing onto the connected IPv4-only network. I presume the appropriate solution here would be to set up an ipv6 tunnel (eg using https://tunnelbroker.net/) on my router?
Yes, if you don't have native IPv6 from your ISP, then a tunnel is a good second choice. Be sure to request a /48 from Hurricane Electric, so you can subdivide the allocated IPv6 addresses (for down stream routers or even a DMZ)
Great, that's working now. Thanks for the pointer.
In order to make it work, I needed a separate way of specifying the tunnel interface, so I added a command line option for that. I've submitted a PR in case you want to include the change.
The section of the script that detects IPv6 addresses isn't working for me. There seem to be two distinct problems. The first is pretty simple:
I don't have an
eth0.2
device, so this isn't working for me. I presume this should be$WAN
instead.The other problem is the detection of LAN_IP6, which isn't producing any results for me. Running through the commands in the pipeline, I get results up as far as
grep noprefixroute
, but the only result there is this one:inet6 fdcf:101c:d870::1/60 scope global noprefixroute
which is obviously filtered by the following
grep -v 'inet6 fd'
.I'm not sure if removing this filter works for me or not -- when I do so I successfully get the network to start, but the ping test at the end of the script is failing. Whether this is caused by some other error or this address issue, I don't know.