Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Given the existing syntax of:
@return {returnType} returnDescription
Your proposal is probably impossible to make backwards compatible, because it
is not possible to distinguish
between the [name of the return value] and [the first words of the description].
@return {Stuff} Objects that have stuff.
@return {Stuff} Objects.Or some other things.
You can accomplish what you want with existing tags though, you can either
describe the return value
properties in the returnDescription directly, or you can document a class for
the returned object like this:
/**
@class
@name UriInformation
@property {String} hostName
@property {Integer} portNumber
*/
/**
@name getUriInformation
@function
@returns {UriInformation}
*/
Original comment by micmath
on 9 Nov 2009 at 12:24
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bkonet...@gmail.com
on 9 Nov 2009 at 10:11