Closed 18370029656 closed 8 months ago
Hi @18370029656,
This is inspired by ICNet. Basically, we want to restrict the maximum deformation potential of the network with the range_flow, since we focused on local non-linear deformation.
Hello, may I ask if there is anything I need to pay attention to when applying your idea to other frameworks? The regions without corresponding relationships that I calculated are always at the edges, as shown in the figure.
You should figure out the best combination of thresh_fw, thresh_bw and reg_code .
thresh_fw, thresh_bw: threshold of the missing correspondence regions for the forward and backward registration. (larger threshold = less sensitive to small missing correspondence regions.) reg_code: the weight of the smoothness regularization. (higher weight = smoother deformation field, less deformation potential.)
thanks for your quick reply!
---Original--- From: "Tony @.> Date: Wed, Nov 22, 2023 16:12 PM To: @.>; Cc: @.**@.>; Subject: Re: [cwmok/DIRAC] normalized the deformation field (Issue #14)
You should figure out the best combination of thresh_fw, thresh_bw and reg_code .
thresh_fw, thresh_bw: threshold of the missing correspondence regions for the forward and backward registration. (larger threshold = less sensitive to small missing correspondence regions.) reg_code: the weight of the smoothness regularization. (higher weight = smoother deformation field, less deformation potential.)
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Hello, why do we need to normalize the deformation field flow and control the deformation variable to [-1,1], so that the maximum deformation does not exceed 1. Is this not very reasonable?