Closed jchartrand closed 10 years ago
I'm hoping this is directed at James.
On Jun 5, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Andrew notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you give me an example of where certainty should go?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Yes, I’ll get that to you asap Andrew. james
On Jun 6, 2014, at 3:30 AM, SusanBrown notifications@github.com wrote:
I'm hoping this is directed at James.
On Jun 5, 2014, at 5:16 PM, Andrew notifications@github.com wrote:
Can you give me an example of where certainty should go?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.
Here’s the owl ontology we’ll use for certainty, and a very simple example of how to use it down at the bottom.
@prefix : http://cwrc.ca/ns/cw . @prefix : http://www.w3.org/ns/oa# . @prefix dc: http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ . @prefix cw: http://cwrc.ca/ns/cw# . @prefix owl: http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl# . @prefix rdf: http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# . @prefix xsd: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema# . @prefix rdfs: http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema# . @prefix dcterms: http://purl.org/dc/terms/ .
http://cwrc.ca/ns/cw# rdf:type owl:Ontology ;
dcterms:modified "2014-04-14T10:17:00-4:00"^^xsd:dateTime ;
owl:versionInfo "0.1.20140414" ;
dc:title "CWRC-Writer Data Model"@en ;
dc:creator "James Chartrand"@en ;
rdfs:comment "Simple ontology for CWRC-Writer concepts not covered by other ontologies."@en ;
dc:description "Simple ontology for CWRC-Writer concepts not covered by other ontologies."@en ;
rdfs:seeAlso <http://cwrc.ca/spec/writer/20140414/index.html> ;
owl:versionIRI <http://cwrc.ca/spec/writer/20140414/cw.owl> .
cw:Certainty rdf:type owl:Class ;
rdfs:label “Certainty"@en ;
rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ;
rdfs:comment """The certainty of an Annotation."""@en ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://cwrc.ca/ns/cw#> .
cw:hasCertainty rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ;
rdfs:label "hasCertainty"@en ;
rdfs:comment "The certainty of the annotation"@en ;
rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://cwrc.ca/ns/cw#> ;
rdfs:domain oa:Annotation ;
rdfs:range cw:Certainty .
cw:certaintyScheme rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual, skos:ConceptScheme ;
rdfs:label “certaintyScheme"@en ;
rdfs:comment "The skos concept scheme for CWRC certainty"@en .
cw:definite rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual, cw:Certainty ;
rdfs:comment “Absolute certainty."@en ;
skos:prefLabel “definite"@en ;
skos:inScheme cw:certaintyScheme .
cw:reasonable rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual, cw:Certainty ;
rdfs:comment “Reasonable certainty."@en ;
skos:prefLabel “Reasonable certainty"@en ;
skos:inScheme cw:certaintyScheme .
cw:probable rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual, cw:Certainty ;
rdfs:comment "Probable certainty."@en ;
skos:prefLabel "Probable certainty"@en ;
skos:inScheme cw:certaintyScheme .
cw:speculative rdf:type owl:NamedIndividual, cw:Certainty ;
rdfs:comment "Speculative certainty."@en ;
skos:prefLabel "Speculative certainty"@en ;
skos:inScheme cw:certaintyScheme .
and then the RDF for an annotation could include:
To my knowledge, this can be closed. @jchartrand , @ajmacdonald , please reinstate if not.
Can you give me an example of where certainty should go?