figure out why intimate_relationship is appearing as a node

[SusanBrown]

In Jewish novelist before 1900 dataset

[smurp]

There are two strange triples involving Blind_Mathilde:

http://cwrc.ca/cwrcdata/Blind_Mathilde

cwrc:hasIntimateRelationshipWith

http://cwrc.ca/cwrcdata/intimate_relationship ;

cwrc:hasPossiblyEroticRelationshipWith

http://cwrc.ca/cwrcdata/intimate_relationship ;

It looks like http://cwrc.ca/cwrcdata/intimate_relationship is being used as an object.

On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 7:36 PM Susan Brown notifications@github.com wrote:

In Jewish novelist before 1900 dataset

[image: image] https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/545952/48640271-0c3f4880-e98b-11e8-881d-98b567431bf5.png

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cwrc/ontology/issues/467, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAvP56z9OZXuOqlCQq6_YMTsEkab69Ssks5uvwWbgaJpZM4YmwyD .

-- Shawn Murphy smurp@smurp.com (780) 903-2428 http://www.smurp.com

[SusanBrown]

Yes, that is what I am seeing too.

@alliyya can you look into this? The object should be a personal name, according to the spreadsheet. There are onhy two IR tags in blinma-b and both contain no name at all, so perhaps that is messing up the script.

[alliyya]

I believe this is from a dated extraction instruction:

Prior to August 12th:

"SUBJECT: The subject of the entry (use URI as usual)PREDICATE: hasIntimateRelationshipWithOBJECT: (other than subject's name) IF there is only one name tag other than the subject OR IF there is not another name tag than the subject's at all, use the instance ""intimate relationship""."

Which after your update on August 12th became:

"SUBJECT: The subject of the entry (use URI as usual) PREDICATE: hasIntimateRelationshipWith OBJECT: (other than subject's name) IF there is only one name tag other than the subject.

I don't believe Gurjap's ir extraction was updated to reflect this decision.

@GurjapSingh Can you review your extraction of Family/interpersonal/intimate relations to make sure it is in step with the biography spreadsheet and comment on any deviations/ add to the extraction document for these components + revise where necessary, thanks!

[SusanBrown]

Thanks for identifying where it was coming from, @alliyya !