Add relationships to label tag instances

[SusanBrown]

E.g. woman, cisWoman, transWoman need to be related to womanLabel

@alliyya I believe that the relationship in accordance with this graffle https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B8C90DSaQG_sazJtMmVHc0s3M0k should be woman isOneOf womanLabel could you pls confirm

@lemaka following confirmation could you please add the relationships, or guide Alliyya to do so, consulting me if/as needed

For the current release if time permits

[alliyya]

I noticed we don't have #queerLabel in the ontology is this a term that needs to be added for the current release? @SusanBrown

[alliyya]

@lemaka If you could review these relations and let me know any other you think may be missing. Thanks!

[SusanBrown]

Don't think we need it for the current release. We should review the gender diagram and make sure we deal with everything on it in one batch.

[lemaka]

@alliyya

label: queer identity A subclass of @@#TextLabel@@, this discursive label reflects the ambiguity of queerness associated with different @@#CulturalForm@@s. It provides a means of aggregating and searching multiple instances of "Queer" (e.g. GenderQueer) cultural identities.

[lemaka]

sorry I'm getting to your query so late, @alliyya !

womanLabel: woman, cisWoman, transWoman

manLabel: man, transMan, cisMan

queerLabel: genderQueer

I'm not exactly sure how they should be related, however:

skos: closeMatch? skos: relatedMatch?

Did you have one in mind, @SusanBrown ?

I vote for 'related.'

[SusanBrown]

@lemaka, I referred to the most recent graffle (and fixed the directional problem we had) to confirm that the relation should be owl:oneOf -- but the ontology doesn't seem to reflect that. However I only looked at the HTML version. @alliyya is this what you used?

[alliyya]

@SusanBrown the relation is there, within the ontology, but not reflected in the documentation. I'm working on getting the oneOf relations to render properly in docgen right now.

[SusanBrown]

Ok good to know, thanks!