cwrc / ontology

CWRC ontology - primary repository
13 stars 4 forks source link

political affiliations relationships to add/remove #240

Closed SusanBrown closed 6 years ago

SusanBrown commented 6 years ago

Political affiliations

~dress reform skos:broaderTerm feminism~

~women’s education reform skos:broaderTerm feminism~

~prochoice skos:relatedTerm feminism antivivisection skos:relatedTerm feminism social purity skos:relatedTerm feminism sexual reform skos:relatedTerm feminism temperance movement skos:relatedTerm feminism anti-caste skos:relatedTerm feminism~ (NOT BT)

~French nationalism skos:broaderTerm nationalism German nationalism skos:broaderTerm nationalism British nationalism skos:broaderTerm nationalism~

~Liberal Unionist Party skos:broaderTerm liberalism~

~antisemitism skos:broaderTerm racism proslavery skos:broaderTerm racism jacobinism skos:broaderTerm revolutionary jacobism skos:broaderTerm revolutionary~

~jacobitism skos:broaderTerm pro-Catholicism~

alliyya commented 6 years ago

@SusanBrown Am I assume that the existing relation in the ontology is being replaced or that this is a new relation just being added unless it conflicts? ex.
women’s education reform skos:broaderTerm feminism

<skos:broaderTransitive rdf:resource="#civilRights"/>
<skos:related rdf:resource="#socialReform"/>

is currently in there for women's education reform

SusanBrown commented 6 years ago

Sorry i couldn’t see the existing relationships when I was noting the changes because I forgot to download the owl file for when I was offline.

For this one ditch the civil rights relationship as feminism will now be a NT of civil rights, but keep the social reform one.

On Feb 20, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Alliyya Mo notifications@github.com wrote:

@SusanBrown https://github.com/susanbrown Am I assume that the existing relation in the ontology is being replaced or just added? ex. women’s education reform skos:broaderTerm feminism

is currently in there for women's education reform

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cwrc/ontology/issues/240#issuecomment-367021288, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAhUoAnfAVKbM1ooH_tHA9bDzcLjHv3Pks5tWum0gaJpZM4SKHhp.