Closed lemaka closed 6 years ago
This is already in the ontology and is simply the inverse of hasCulturalForm
allowing people to search by cultural forms and working backwards.
Yes, I figured that out. I think it should perhaps be cuturalFormOf as I think that makes more sense syntactically— not sure if we should change the URL or just the label.
On Mar 3, 2018, at 4:36 PM, Joel Cummings notifications@github.com wrote:
This is already in the ontology and is simply the inverse of hasCulturalForm allowing people to search by cultural forms and working backwards.
— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cwrc/ontology/issues/254#issuecomment-370181746, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAhUoHMKK4IksWLeLIpDl9Ahb339drJ8ks5tawzcgaJpZM4SXUyY.
Let's just change both so they match. From now we can be consistent with our relation naming.
Susan: I have no idea what this means or what it would do.