Religions and religious organizations

[SusanBrown]

Here in a sketch is my proposal for how these should work together. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1cssSMkJN25lqIRPd4W45JAiiM-7Ui6E1

[alliyya]

cwrc:Organization should be deprecated in favour of org:FormalOrganization ? @SusanBrown And educational organization should be a subclass of org:FormalOrganization similarly to religious organization?

[SusanBrown]

Yes

On Jul 9, 2018, at 12:48 PM, Alliyya Mo notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

cwrc:Organization should be deprecated in favour of org:FormalOrganization ? @SusanBrownhttps://github.com/SusanBrown And educational organization should be a subclass of org:FormalOrganization similarly to religious organization?

— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cwrc/ontology/issues/400#issuecomment-403544739, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAhUoKYa2RcJm-1staYzLzLxTK8tEFTNks5uE4lngaJpZM4UzKFT.

[alliyya]

In terms of extraction for Religion: What should happen if the DENOMINATION is with no reg value and contains an ORGNAME:

<DENOMINATION><ORGNAME REG="Roman Catholic Church" STANDARD="Roman Catholic Church">Roman Catholics</ORGNAME></DENOMINATION> Right now Roman Catholics(the freeform of the orgname) is an alt label for Roman Catholicism the religion. So the religion can possibly be ascribed to the person that way. (Matching freeform of the org to altlabels of religions)

But I'm wondering if it should go through a query to see what religion that organization belongs to. (However this may lead to edge cases where an organization belongs to multiple religions and we wouldn't know for certain what religion that person subscribes to)

OR: if there's only an orgname in a denomination tag, only create the org:memberOf relation for that entry. aka no hasReligion for the this person

@SusanBrown

[SusanBrown]

If they belong to an org, then give them membership in that religion as well but not vice versa.

On Jul 9, 2018, at 1:19 PM, Alliyya Mo notifications@github.com<mailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

Assigned #400https://github.com/cwrc/ontology/issues/400 to @SusanBrownhttps://github.com/SusanBrown.

— You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/cwrc/ontology/issues/400#event-1723679626, or mute the threadhttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAhUoBjbFu_ngHWPKMoFKfGCbp5eMVI3ks5uE5CagaJpZM4UzKFT.

[alliyya]

Religious Organizations will always be connected to a Religion, the same cannot be said for a Political affiliation and Political Organization. Range of hasPoliticalAffiliation to be expanded to include PoliticalOrganizations as well as PoliticalAffilation.

[lemaka]

@alliyya @SusanBrown this looks done to me, can this be closed and marked w the 'decision' label?