search

cwrc / ontology

CWRC ontology - primary repository
13 stars 7 forks source link

several situations where rdfs:label should likely be rdfs:comment #78

Closed smurp closed 7 years ago

smurp commented 7 years ago

I would suggest that @en version of rdfs:label should be an rdfs:comment value instead

cwrc:lowerMiddleClass
    rdfs:label "This includes employees, clerical workers, teachers, and governesses. Note, however, that some teachers go into Professional (Mr. Chips) and women starting schools and then managing them also go into Professional."@en, "classe basse moyenne"@fr ;

Other examples of this non-optimal use of rdfs:label include:

cwrc:shopkeepers
cwrc:skilledCraftpersonArtisan 
cwrc:urban-industrialUnskilled
cwrc:yeoman-farmer
SusanBrown commented 7 years ago

Should not be comment should be definition.