Exit code is 1, but no message. There should be a message.
Killing the superblock also only works on the host that created it. I can see going either way on this, but it at least seems reasonable. Should there be a double-secret force?
We changed the behavior so that "mkfs.famfs -fk " always kills the superblock. This is in part because of the recently merged PR that changes how we get the system uuid. We might revert that behavior after all users are running the new system uuid method. And we might add a super-secret kill-superblock method that can kill a superblock created by another node.
Exit code is 1, but no message. There should be a message.
Killing the superblock also only works on the host that created it. I can see going either way on this, but it at least seems reasonable. Should there be a double-secret force?