Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
It's the same bitstream with different -size or -psnr value.
I have tried several times, the same as -f above.
Original comment by denghblz...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2015 at 12:11
The PSNR value displayed doesn't take post-processing into account. It would be
slow and would make the encoder slightly more complicated.
So, the PSNR value displayed is for "unfiltered output samples", the one you
would get with -f 0.
Original comment by pascal.m...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2015 at 6:21
[closing as WAI]
note that -psnr has a different effect: it sets the target PSNR the encoder
should try to achieve iteratively. And similarly for -size. These two options
should be used in conjunction to -pass <int> option in order to be effective.
Original comment by pascal.m...@gmail.com
on 10 Oct 2015 at 6:10
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
denghblz...@gmail.com
on 20 May 2015 at 12:01