Closed goyalyashpal closed 10 months ago
you can close this after reading 😃
Also,
Restructuring
vs Refactoring
as mentioned in this blog RefactoringMalApropism | Martin Fowlerstruct
seems good enough...123 456 789 012
res tru ctu re
res tru ct
rew rit e
str uct
rst rct
rer yt
rst ct
str ct
Hi!
kudos for adhering to conventional commits since v0.5. ur changelogs look awesome
One extremely small thing i thought to bring in your notice is that:
rfct
(and alsoenh
)refactor
while trying to think of different combinations of omissions, i stumbled upon the obvious one:
refac
chore
,style
) i.e. only one letter more thanrfct
refac
tor, hence:feat
ure,perf
ormance,enh
ancementecosia search: refac commit | duckduckgo search: refac commit
So what?
umh, nothing much... it's entirely upto you. as i said, i just wanted to discuss this with you - not necessarily aimed at any particular outcome...
it it makes sense to you, then you may choose to use
refac
in future; but downside to it can be that if doing anything programmatic using commit messages from these pastrfct
ones - u'll have to consider for bothrfct
andrefac
which might be error prone.but this use-case can be a corner case in and on itself...
what are your thoughts on this?? 😃