Closed izgeri closed 4 years ago
@izgeri I think removing the demo from conjurintros even if it's a duplicate in the end will fragment our demo repos even further than they already are. I'm not sure it's a good path forward for this, especially since we don't have a good plan for moving all conjur intros to there.
conjurintros
is a DAP-only repo, and the demos in this repo will be able to be published on conjur.org as well as having source available here. it's intended that the OSS demo flows will be primarily in this repo. DAP is a separate question.
closing, since we're opting not to proceed with this katacoda flow for now.
There is an example flow in the
conjurdemos/conjur-intro
repo that builds a Java app that uses the Java client library and deploys it to OpenShift together with Conjur / the Kubernetes authenticator using the helm chart.This would be a great (and detailed) katacoda flow, and we could also extrapolate it to other language examples.
In addition, since the
conjur-intro
repo is primarily DAP demo flows, we should move the code from there to here, modifying as needed to make this flow generalizable to multiple languages and to work in katacoda. We may also need to use kubernetes instead of openshift for this flow.The flow in
conjur-intro
is currently in two steps:AC:
conjur-intro
repo