Open BarceloChristian opened 1 year ago
Yes, we are putting our effort mainly on ROS 2 and only maintain the ROS 1 interface minimally. A contribution to this repository is always welcome, as long as it doesn't implies extra work for us, except for the review.
Hi!
I was wondering if there's any reason why
webots_ros
is not structured the same waywebots_ros2
. Mainly the import of devices through the</webots>
in the URDF.Is it just because the effort is put into
ROS 2
, or there's any other reason I'm not seeing? If so, would a contribution to this repository to replicate its usage be welcomed?