Closed mastercyb closed 5 years ago
@xhipster
Also, want to get opinions from other players: @Pechalka @asadovka @litvintech @arturalbov
I'm voting for CBD. IMO, CYB is really confusing name for cyberd token. First that came in mind when I hear CYB - is our browser.
@xhipster @hleb-albau seems that we will have enough problems with misunderstanding of projects, tokens and protocols.
In cyb browser there is a reserved app .cyb which stands for system pages and settings. Also, there is an app with controversial name .cyber (which is for search or all protocol functions). If we agree, that, for example, .eth app (ethereum protocol explorer) is valid, . cyb will be responsible for exploring cyberd tokens, which can cause conflicts.
In my opinion, we should reduce the amount of names, that start with "cyb..."
So, for now:
Also, our project is called cyber.Search, and this name is a bit old-fashioned and doesn't explain what we are currently doing.
I think the best solution is live communication, where we will agree on all our "cyber" things, project names etc.
@xhipster @hleb-albau I'm voting for CYB for main cyberd's 1st level token And don't see problems which should confuse users with the cyb browser The 1st level token is mostly hidden for users in the meaning of economy rather than 2nd level tokens (one of them will be our CYBER). CBD is bootstrapping and transitioning token from Ethereum and there are should be different names for cyberd's 1st and 2nd level tokens.
First feedback from users shows that it is confusing that we have tokens in different networks with same names. It is also bad decision because according to our distribution plan eventually they will have different value. We need to change the name of the token in our main network so it will not be confusing to humans. CBD - proto substance token, CYB - main token with utility. Also we need to think how to prevent exchanges from listing of CYB tokens.