Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
What should the invalid parameter origdate have been corrected to?
Original comment by MartinS
on 13 Jul 2010 at 3:27
In this case, the entire field should be deleted, as shown in the next edit.
Original comment by ed.pal...@gmail.com
on 13 Jul 2010 at 8:14
Should the origdate parameter ALWAYS be deleted? Or are there cases where it
should be corrected to, for example, archivedate?
Original comment by MartinS
on 15 Jul 2010 at 7:43
I don't know. Origdate is not a valid parameter for cite book, so it is
difficult to discern the intent.
Original comment by ed.pal...@gmail.com
on 15 Jul 2010 at 7:53
Unless there is a robust strategy that the bot can use, then, I think that the
default behaviour should be preserved. I can't imagine that the parameter is
used very widely, seeming as it has never been supported.
Original comment by MartinS
on 15 Jul 2010 at 8:05
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
ed.pal...@gmail.com
on 3 Jul 2010 at 10:52