Closed Robinlovelace closed 11 months ago
Fixed in #73 as shown below:
> j = journey(from = start_coords, to = end_coords)
> names(j)
[1] "name" "distances" "time" "busynance" "quietness"
[6] "gradient_segment" "elevation_change" "provisionName" "start_longitude" "start_latitude"
[11] "finish_longitude" "finish_latitude" "crow_fly_distance" "event" "whence"
[16] "speed" "itinerary" "plan" "note" "length"
[21] "west" "south" "east" "north" "leaving"
[26] "arriving" "grammesCO2saved" "calories" "edition" "geometry"
[31] "gradient_smooth"
Oh, you've just fixed it, but I was in the middle of telling you the following:
Note that output from the api endpoint for that route, i.e.
Does not repeat the provisionName.
{"marker":[{"@attributes":{"start":"Un-named link","finish":"Un-named link","start_longitude":"-8.80639","start_latitude":"52.50692","finish_longitude":"-8.80565","finish_latitude":"52.51329","crow_fly_distance":"710","event":"depart","whence":"1691218472","speed":"16","itinerary":"0","plan":"fastest","note":"","length":"769","time":"220","busynance":"1383","quietness":"56","signalledJunctions":"0","signalledCrossings":"0","west":"-8.80639","south":"52.50692","east":"-8.80403","north":"52.51329","name":"Un-named link to Un-named link","walk":"0","leaving":"2023-08-05 07:54:32","arriving":"2023-08-05 07:58:12","coordinates":"-8.80639,52.50692 -8.80586,52.50755 -8.80498,52.50855 -8.80460,52.50901 -8.80433,52.50935 -8.80412,52.50959 -8.80403,52.50973 -8.80408,52.51001 -8.80418,52.51045 -8.80421,52.51062 -8.80426,52.51089 -8.80434,52.5114 -8.80442,52.51181 -8.80443,52.51191 -8.80452,52.51209 -8.80495,52.51255 -8.80548,52.5131 -8.80552,52.51315 -8.80565,52.51329","elevations":"45,44,47,50,51,52,53,53,53,53,52,50,49,48,49,48,48,48,48","distances":"79,126,57,42,30,17,31,49,19,30,57,46,11,21,59,71,6,18","grammesCO2saved":"143","calories":"13","edition":"routing230801","type":"route"}},{"@attributes":{"name":"Un-named link","legNumber":"1","distance":"769","time":"220","busynance":"1383","quietness":"70","flow":"0","walk":"0","signalledJunctions":"0","signalledCrossings":"0","turn":"","startBearing":"27","color":"#33aa33","points":"-8.80639,52.50692 -8.80586,52.50755 -8.80498,52.50855 -8.80460,52.50901 -8.80433,52.50935 -8.80412,52.50959 -8.80403,52.50973 -8.80408,52.51001 -8.80418,52.51045 -8.80421,52.51062 -8.80426,52.51089 -8.80434,52.5114 -8.80442,52.51181 -8.80443,52.51191 -8.80452,52.51209 -8.80495,52.51255 -8.80548,52.5131 -8.80552,52.51315 -8.80565,52.51329","distances":"0,79,126,57,42,30,17,31,49,19,30,57,46,11,21,59,71,6,18","elevations":"45,44,47,50,51,52,53,53,53,53,52,50,49,48,49,48,48,48,48","provisionName":"Unclassified road","type":"segment"}}],"waypoint":[{"@attributes":{"longitude":"-8.80639","latitude":"52.50692","sequenceId":"1"}},{"@attributes":{"longitude":"-8.80565","latitude":"52.51329","sequenceId":"2"}}]}```
Yes, it was our side. Thanks Simon, I was saying to my colleague Hussein that we could benefit from refactoring some parts of the codebase..
As shown in the example below, the
provisionName
column is duplicated for some routes it seems:Created on 2023-08-05 with reprex v2.0.2