Open road-runner-osm opened 1 month ago
The reasoning behind this decision is that usually (in practice) access=forestry|agricultural
highways are bikable and most taggers may not realize that such access restriction actually prohibits bicycles from using them. See taginfo for instance where only 17% of access=agricultural
has a bicycle=yes
indication, which seems way too low.
I'm not aware of any tracks that would be dedicated exclusively for agricultural/forestry vehicles and not accessible for pedestrians/bike. The only case I am aware of are actually access=private
tracks (which should be tagged as such).
Happy to reconsider if I'm missing something though.
vehicle/access=forestry
andvehicle/access=agricultural
are a special case of vehicle/access=private, they only allow certain people to use a track/road. A driving ban (that only allows agricultural or forestry traffic) actually prohibits normal bikes from using a track/street, so imho it should also be rendered in white.