Open gonuke opened 9 years ago
That would probably be useful. I am not sure how this interplay would work. @FlanFlanagan or @rwcarlsen might be able to clue us in?
This is the currently implementation of categorical. "categorical": ["item1", "item2", "item3"]
Though, now that I think about it this will fall apart for nest categorical items. The same will hold true for range items. So I'm going to try and come up with a solution to this asap.
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Matthew Gidden notifications@github.com wrote:
That would probably be useful. I am not sure how this interplay would work. @FlanFlanagan https://github.com/FlanFlanagan or @rwcarlsen https://github.com/rwcarlsen might be able to clue us in?
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/cyclus/cycamore/issues/343#issuecomment-99538415.
Robert Flanagan Graduate Research Assistant Nuclear and Radiation Engineering Program Department of Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas at Austin
Did we ever come up with a solution for this?
Oh, nope. I let this slip, sorry! I'll try and tackle it once my defense is done.
No worries - I'm just running through the issues getting ready for another cyclus release.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 3:16 PM, FlanFlanagan notifications@github.com wrote:
Oh, nope. I let this slip, sorry! I'll try and tackle it once my defense is done.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/cyclus/cycamore/issues/343#issuecomment-157509646.
Since there is a fixed set of keywords allowable for this variable, should we give the UI hints using the 'categorical' annotation? Will this work with a vector<>?