search

cyclus / fundamentals-paper

A repository to hold the fundamentals paper
Creative Commons Zero v1.0 Universal
1 stars 8 forks source link

No previous mention of three demonstration archetypes #95

Closed gidden closed 9 years ago

gidden commented 9 years ago

We mention archetypes in two places: Tables 1 and 3. Then the simulations example cites cycamore::Reactor, cycamore::Fab, and cycamore::Separations. First, none of these are in cycamore proper. Second, they have not been mentioned until this section. I think the easiest course of action is to add descriptions in Table 3 and remove the cycamore namespace in the text. I know we discussed this before as a group, but I don't think any resolution was found.

katyhuff commented 9 years ago

The thing we discussed as a group was that these items were going to end up in Cycamore before the upcoming release... which solves at least that part of it. Was that what you recall, @rwcarlsen ?