Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Another possibility is to type in your connection upload speed but it would
require a
table with WU result sizes for all projects.
Original comment by carlos.c...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2010 at 7:41
The easiest thing to do right now would be to give you another bonus calculation
upload time value. Where you can add so many minutes to the estimated
completion
time. Then I'd just take that into account when calculating the bonus PPD.
However, I'm not sure I want to go down this route. Some things I want to do
in the
future beyond 0.5.0 is better support for data mining the WU history... so I
may even
be able to "guesstimate" this upload time value based on that WU history... and
this
is the approach I'd rather take.
Original comment by harlam357
on 18 Feb 2010 at 5:35
It is certainly the most complete and best option. But couldn't you add support
to
adding minutes so that we can have a temporary workaround?
Original comment by carlos.c...@gmail.com
on 19 Feb 2010 at 10:35
Original comment by harlam357
on 28 Mar 2010 at 8:23
Original comment by harlam357
on 28 Mar 2010 at 9:02
Original comment by harlam357
on 12 May 2010 at 11:34
Attempt to get the WU result data file size from the queue.dat (at least I
think that
value is there). Then, use that value in conjunction with the Upload Average
speed
also reported by the queue.dat.
Original comment by harlam357
on 13 May 2010 at 11:34
I guess these can help:
http://fahwiki.net/index.php/Queue.dat
http://linuxminded.xs4all.nl/?target=software-qd-tools.plc
Original comment by carlos.c...@gmail.com
on 15 May 2010 at 3:25
Original comment by harlam357
on 9 Oct 2010 at 3:24
Even if I added a value to each client to adjust the total WU time now with v7
and multiple slots this isn't a good fit since the client isn't bound to a
single type of work (Uni/SMP/GPU). One also has to consider the different
types of work a client or slot may be assigned; and to my knowledge with v7
there is no information available on the size of the WU results file.
Original comment by harlam357
on 23 Mar 2012 at 3:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
carlos.c...@gmail.com
on 15 Feb 2010 at 7:33Attachments: