search

cygnusxi / hfm-net

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/hfm-net
2 stars 0 forks source link

New ProtoMol Projects don't report frame progress on the precent boundry. Causes HFM to show a cyclic 'Offline' status. #191

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. Viewing the main screen
2.
3.

What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
I expect the "Status" to show (green) "Online".  Status shows 
(gray) "Offline".

What version of the product are you using? On what operating system?
0.4.10 r156 on Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit

Please provide any additional information below.
Seems to be possibly a parsing issue with the log?  As per the attached 
image, recognition seems to be somewhat cyclic.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by matt.r...@usa.net on 7 Apr 2010 at 11:01

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
i also have this issues with virtual machine clients, it will either show 
offline or 
the purple "getting work packet" status yet shows up in the log viewer

Original comment by julie.gi...@gmail.com on 8 Apr 2010 at 12:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Yay... more ProtoMol screwing things up.  The issue there is that HFM only logs
progress lines in which the raw completed / raw total steps is within 10% of the
reported percentage.  This is done to avoid logging partial frame times to the
benchmarks.

The line that reports 364500 of 499375 says that it is 72% complete, when in 
fact
that calculates to almost 73% (72.9%).  The ProtoMol developer has slightly 
deviated
from the traditional Gromacs style of reporting WU progress.  In this current
configuration it will be nearly impossible to report an accurate frame time as 
frames
(percentage of completion) are even skipped in the output.  At the top of the 
HFM Log
viewer you'll see that a progress line labeled as 47% was not even written to 
the
log, it went directly from 46% to 48%.

Original comment by harlam357 on 9 Apr 2010 at 2:00

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by harlam357 on 9 Apr 2010 at 2:01

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by harlam357 on 9 Apr 2010 at 2:02

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Oh yeah, please send me some logs to my gmail account.  I can't effectively 
*try* to
fix it without sample data.

Original comment by harlam357 on 9 Apr 2010 at 2:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago

Original comment by harlam357 on 28 Apr 2010 at 1:39

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Marked Fixed for Revision 170.

Original comment by harlam357 on 28 Apr 2010 at 4:17