Closed Siequnu closed 3 years ago
As these are headline stats, could these be added in as a matter of priority?
Agreed, sounds like an important headline stat and I thought they were already in there.
I thought we would use percent_commute_active_scenario as a headline stat instead.
I can add in these figures with a small calculation.
I've created percent_commute_walk_scenario and percent_commute_cycle_scenario.
There are some places where walking is lower in the scenario than the baseline - these are rural sites with no nearby destinations.
Great work, thanks @joeytalbot! Please confirm @Siequnu and close/comment when you get a chance.
Does this mean we can dump the temporary Python script?
@mvl22 The python script is used to generate a csv for the front-page circular graph, not related to this.
@joeytalbot great stuff, now displaying on the site-level data.
The all-sites geojson is missing the corresponding goactive percentages for percent_commute_walk_base and percent_commute_cycle_base.
At the moment the only transport mode that are described both in current and goactive scenarios is percent_commute_drive_base.
As these are headline stats, could these be added in as a matter of priority?
@Robinlovelace or @joeytalbot ?