Rebuild all abstr scenarios

[Robinlovelace]

Heads-up @dabreegster I'm planning to rebuild all the abstr scenarios this morning, can you test for a sample sites, e.g. Great-Kneighton, Allerton Bywater and Poundbury before pulling in all this new data just to be sure?

[Robinlovelace]

Sanity check on data for one scenario file: file is of same size and structure so think this is fine:

diff --git a/data-small/bath-riverside/scenario_base.json b/data-small/bath-riverside/scenario_base.json
index 108ddc6..54e53bd 100644
--- a/data-small/bath-riverside/scenario_base.json
+++ b/data-small/bath-riverside/scenario_base.json
@@ -4,17 +4,17 @@
     {
       "origin": {
         "Position": {
-          "longitude": -2.3773,
-          "latitude": 51.3842
+          "longitude": -2.3771,
+          "latitude": 51.3851
         }
       },
       "trips": [
         {
-          "departure": 32095,
+          "departure": 29069,
           "destination": {
             "Position": {
-              "longitude": -2.3601,
-              "latitude": 51.3984
+              "longitude": -2.3444,
+              "latitude": 51.4
             }
           },
           "mode": "Drive",
@@ -25,20 +25,20 @@
     {
       "origin": {
         "Position": {
-          "longitude": -2.3791,
-          "latitude": 51.3872
+          "longitude": -2.3756,
+          "latitude": 51.3823
         }
       },
       "trips": [
         {

[Robinlovelace]

Error message for tyersal-lane:

Building for tyersal-lane
Reading layer `multipolygons' from data source `/mnt/57982e2a-2874-4246-a6fe-115c199bc6bd/data/osm/geofabrik_west-yorkshire-latest.gpkg' using driver `GPKG'
Simple feature collection with 460615 features and 25 fields
geometry type:  MULTIPOLYGON
dimension:      XY
bbox:           xmin: -2.189691 ymin: 53.4693 xmax: -1.147365 ymax: 53.97511
geographic CRS: WGS 84
Error in `[<-.data.frame`(`*tmp*`, ids_odd, c("x", "y"), value = logical(0)) : 
  replacement has 0 items, need 4

[dabreegster]

I'll spot check for a few sites, then reimport everything. Thanks for fixing all the issues upstream!

[Robinlovelace]

Great. Pay particular attention to LCID and Micklefield, I have reason to suspect that the results will not be quite right linked to an issue fixed before this latest round of data was generated: https://github.com/cyipt/actdev/commit/caed3cd2f7da5e4e8763060005f0aae76c8e81bb

[dabreegster]

Done! I'll deploy a new release once some more abst UI and bg traffic fixes are done.

... Although I just realized I forgot to run the new tool to add return and lunch trips. I'll do that when I'm back from an appt.

Pay particular attention to LCID and Micklefield

What sort of validations should I be looking for? Main observation at Micklefield is that there are only 17 people total.