Closed joeytalbot closed 3 years ago
See these 3 gists I have started to look at the specific area boundaries:
1 Poundbury 2 Chapelford 3 Allerton Bywater
By following the first link in the '.md' document I believe you can freely edit the boundaries in geojson.io if they are not correct
The other links show the Large applications found within that area - not exactly user friendly yet but gives you an idea.
For Poundbury there are at least two or three that look promising but for Chapelford and Allerton Bywater there was only 1 Large application in each case within the area.
Here's a new gist for Poundbury https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/9cf8c15ce9142609c9611abf9fb7d8bc
Allerton Bywater: https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/1a45ddc0f24c3c4b261cc6f109771140
Great thanks I will copy your defintions. However I was hoping we could collaborate using the gists as the whole point is they are public. However irritatingly as you found the geojson.io only seems to give access to your own gists!
Castle Mead https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/67f7cc366b5ba582dea70ee19fc49c62 - EDITED
Ashton Park https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/dc0bd99686cc0c07a52a9522238d01b3
Leeds Climate Innovation District: https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/996bde208dc6d53919d642eeebe121cf
Dicken's Heath https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/887537f2fbf52b7e3e0b24276b4da15a
Newcastle Great Park https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/1928fe69cf900be085b510abbe3cfaaa
I hope I got all the sites you have done the boundaries for in this table, Joey.
https://gist.github.com/aspeakman/989994ec957da57640610d9aa1cd0939
Thanks @aspeakman ! This table only includes the sites up to Didcot, missing the ones that I posted after that (ie. the last 14).
Sorry my mistake updating. Should have 33 entries now
Brilliant, thanks!
Working on trying to put all these in a single geojson file.
Did we agree to use (Greater) Cambridge as an area? This is a major growth area and ensures we have a high-cycling scenario in our examples, which will be needed when stress-testing ultimate outputs.
If you can confirm, I can suggest some sites.
I have updated the table with numbers of Large applications in each case:
https://gist.github.com/aspeakman/989994ec957da57640610d9aa1cd0939
@mvl22 I have included two Cambridge sites - Great Kneighton and Trumpington Meadows. These should be high cycling and also have excellent public transport. If there are other developments you think should be included let us know. I could also add in a couple of extra urban TfNH sites in London and Bath that will be better that most in transport terms.
have updated the table with numbers of Large applications in each case:
https://gist.github.com/aspeakman/989994ec957da57640610d9aa1cd0939
Thanks @aspeakman that's really useful
Bath Western Riverside https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/2a9e4d32f649d61f419545d84ccbd44a
Kidbrooke Village https://gist.github.com/joeytalbot/6ecb87a4213822eb3a2a78bb925dc4ab
I've uploaded all 35 sites as a release all-sites.geojson
under tag 0.1.1
Great work @joeytalbot! I think we can close this issue for now in that case.
This will be derived from the list of mainly TfNH sites that is found here (#5)