Closed Robinlovelace closed 3 years ago
Follow-up from meeting today - looking to get your input on this @mvl22, @Siequnu and @joeytalbot. What do we want to ask people about the prototype on 12th March and possibly longer term? Starter for 10 based on the still working CyIPT form:
[ ] How effectively do you feel the website conveys how cycle/walking -friendly a site is? [ ] Are there any key data sources which you use when judging developments, that we have not included?
Updated title after chat with @joeytalbot - we can close this issue when a MS Form is up and running - similar to this: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=qO3qvR3IzkWGPlIypTW3y9orQ9urif9IgBaXiRS9eEpURURCMEZPVjBRUDg2UTlWSjZYOVlRSU9DTC4u
[ ] How confident are you that your team could use this tool alongside existing datasets to inform decisions? (or something similar to test out their comfort w/ using the tool -- some LPAs are still using manual google map routing for accessibility, some just outsource for TRACC)
Some specific to A/B Street:
This is looking great. A few quick comments:
In which settlement type are you based?
Is that really necessary? I think "In which settlement types are you most interested in?" will be more relevant to practitioners.
I think a free text question along the lines of "What tools do you currently use for assessing walking and cycling provision and potential in/around sites?" with a free text or options like:
[ ] Google Maps
[ ] PCT
[ ] TRACC
[ ] Other
If you said other please state which
That would be really useful info.
What tools do you currently use
If you are going to ask this, it needs a longer list (I'm not sure what the entries would be), and put GMaps at the end as that's not a proper assessment tool.
Here's an updated questionnaire. It's getting quite long now. https://forms.office.com/Pages/DesignPage.aspx#FormId=qO3qvR3IzkWGPlIypTW3yyMypkiIdOJGrvs4vzE0KWxUQzY2WDhJVFNDTzk0Q1oxQlVSSkJaSUVGMi4u&Token=1b25122d7478446486131eba0b4e13de
Are there any less important questions we can remove?
No. 12/13 seems obsolete since we already have that in place.
Does Office Forms let 'other' be combined into the previous question? Those 'other' questions really bulk up the length.
This is looking great to me :+1:
It will be good to continuously get feedback. We have done this in the past with Microsoft Forms - e.g. see here which is linked to from https://www.cyipt.bike/
That works fine and is a safe default. But wonder if there are other better mechanisms to this - any ideas from software/design/future-proofing perspectives welcome, what is best practice these days?
In any case, whichever form system we use, we need some questions. I can think of some but will start it as an open question: what questions should we ask knowledgeable stakeholders who use this for the first time?