Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Original comment by mikechambers
on 2 Jul 2008 at 4:40
This is a strict mode / non-strict mode change. When strict mode is turned off
we
should allow for decoding of non-quoted object identifier strings.
It is not valid JSON to have object identifiers not have quotes. However, a
lot of
other JSON lirabries seem to output these invalid strings by default.
So, when strict mode is ON, a parse error should be generated as is the current
behavior.
When strict mode is OFF, we should process the identifier like it was a string
even
if it isn't enclosed in quotes
Original comment by darron.schall
on 23 Oct 2008 at 2:15
Original comment by mikechambers
on 7 Nov 2008 at 7:28
Issue 83 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by darron.schall
on 10 Dec 2008 at 4:46
I'm interested in which JSON libraries you know of that emit unquoted property
names. The es5-discuss mailing list is currently discussing whether the
standard ES5
JSON parser will need to accept them.
Original comment by davidsar...@googlemail.com
on 4 Jun 2009 at 10:16
Has this issue been resolved yet? Been expecting it to be resolved since last
Winter
break...tried the latest version but to no avail
Original comment by evan_m...@sympatico.ca
on 12 Jul 2009 at 1:07
@evan - No, this has not been resolved yet. However, as long as you're using
properly formatted JSON you
shouldn't run into trouble.
I'm still debating if this is really worth implementing because it goes against
JSON syntax (per es5 discussions).
If a library claims to output JSON strings, then the library should be using
quoted object keys.
Original comment by darron.schall
on 13 Jul 2009 at 2:55
@darron - Oh ok, thank you very much for your prompt reply. See we are working
with
Moodle and the MySql database doesn't allow for quoted values to be stored.
From
what I understand, that is one of the reasons why there is a demand and use
case for
parsing non-quoted JSON strings.
Any chance we may re-consider? What options do you there are?
Original comment by evan_m...@sympatico.ca
on 13 Jul 2009 at 2:21
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
marcin...@gmail.com
on 4 Sep 2007 at 12:50