Closed shikokuchuo closed 4 months ago
Thanks for breaking constructive :D. We can definitely handle this.
This should be fixed by #454
Meaning it won't fail and reproduce the object accurately (as a matrix with a class). To use idiomatic constructors there's a bit more work:
There are many constructors that can be used to build a xts object :
I'm not sure what exactly should be the default one but the example uses as.xts.matrix() so I think we can start with this one.
We also want to support objects of class timeSeries and zoo in another ticket.
Would be nice to release a patch of minor version with all the ts stuff handled at once if it's not too hard.
Thanks, can confirm that PR fixes the issue.
I like how it is constructed, as it highlights the simplicity of the internal structure of an xts/zoo object, which is just a matrix with am index attribute. But of course I am biased as this is exactly how I construct these objects at the C level.
A matrix converted using as.zoo / as.xts makes sense as an idiomatic constructor.
Yes, I've implemented the constructors already, as.xts() on a data.frame looks the best but I would need to depend on the xts package to make it the default constructor, so it'll be as.xts() on matrices instead. I need to add some tests and push. I'll implement zoo constructors afterwards.
On Wed, 10 Jul 2024, 16:34 Charlie Gao, @.***> wrote:
Thanks, can confirm that PR fixes the issue.
I like how it is constructed, as it highlights the simplicity of the internal structure of an xts/zoo object, which is just a matrix with am index attribute. But of course I am biased as this is exactly how I construct these objects at the C level.
A matrix converted using as.zoo / as.xts makes sense as an idiomatic constructor.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/cynkra/constructive/issues/453#issuecomment-2220685851, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEMAMYSPQHD7IERL4IF5ELDZLVBBHAVCNFSM6AAAAABKTXBE6WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEMRQGY4DKOBVGE . You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID: @.***>
An 'xts' object is just a matrix with a time index. This example works fine with dput but fails with constructive (and it is not apparent from the error message why).
Created on 2024-07-09 with reprex v2.1.0
If this can't be handled, perhaps the error message can be improved, or else fall back to dput with a warning?