cyrusimap / bugzilla-migrate-test

0 stars 1 forks source link

MultiDomain Newsgroups #687

Open brong opened 21 years ago

brong commented 21 years ago

From: Carl P. Corliss Bugzilla-Id: 2105 Version: 2.2.x Owner: Ken Murchison

brong commented 21 years ago

From: Carl P. Corliss

>>>MultiDomain newsgroups: >>>----------------------- >>>Allowing users to access newsgroups from multiple domains. In particular, >>>we need to allow users to access public newsgroups across multiple >>>domains (ie., anonymous user). For example, we have domains >>>ddfoundation.org and xaraya.com (default domain) with the following >>>shared folders (this isn't all just a small selection of them): >>> >>>newsgroup maps to public/private >>>---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>ddf.bod ddf/bod@ddfoundation.org private >>>ddf.public ddf/public@ddfoundation.org public >>>ddf.founders ddf/founders@ddfoundation.org private >>>xaraya.developer xaraya/developer private >>>xaraya.public-dev xaraya/public-dev public >>>xaraya.pmc xaraya/pmc private >>>xaraya.users xaraya/users public >>>xaraya.curiousa xaraya/curiousa public >>> >> >>I agree that this makes perfect sense for newsgroups. You'd have to >>check the list archives for some of the issues that I've brought up >>before, but the two that come to mind right now are how to handle the >>'anyone' and 'anonymous' userids (how to differentiate between anyone >>within the domain and anyone regardless of domain?) and how to present >
>
> You could make anonymous rights explicit - meaning that 'anyone' doesn't allow
> 'anonymous' (which would be the opposite of what, iirc, it does currently). I
> would think that anonymous should show all folders that are set public with
> anonymous rights (anonymous +lr) and 'anyone' should only refer to users who
> have authenticated and are within that specific domain. However, there would
> still remain the issue of adding rights for users in differing domains. >
>
>>these mailboxes via the protocol (do they show up as a separate shared >>namespace?). >
>
> Hmm.. That's a tough one - could argue for having them all under the same
> shared namespace however, then you (might) have possible name collisions.
> Maybe prefix -all- shared folders with the domain name (including the default
> domain) ? >
> For example, using the example I gave up above, a user logging into imap would
> see the following folder structure: >
> INBOX > ... > share > ddfoundation.org > public > xaraya.com > public-dev > users > curiousa >
>

brong commented 10 years ago

From: Bron Gondwana

Batch moving bugs that won't be in 2.5