Closed gwaybio closed 2 years ago
I like the idea. Would you go ahead and restructure the repo?
I like the idea. Would you go ahead and restructure the repo?
Will do!
Thank you Greg for taking over this. This was the exact plan that I started working with late last year. The list wasn't yet curated enough to be added to the awesome list.
I agree that we should keep software, datasets etc. in the list as these are resources we want to share. Earlier we had discussions about having a threshold for the number of citations to publication to be accepted to the list. However, we decided to go with more qualitative selection since with threshold even a truly great paper doesn't make it to the list until about two years after publication and application papers get much more citations than landmark methodological papers.
Good to know @lopaavol! If you have any suggestions for #2 that would be great too
Pull request opened sindresorhus/awesome#1595
We have an option of adding our
awesome-cytodata
collection to theawesome
stuff curation page (https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome).They have quite a complicated contribution guideline! (with over 100K stars, this is not that surprising!)
We should consider doing this. It will
If we decide to add to the official awesome list, I think we should restructure the repo a bit.
data sets
,software
,etc.