Closed michaelbornholdt closed 2 years ago
Merging #63 (2f52623) into master (779cea1) will increase coverage by
0.00%
. The diff coverage is100.00%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #63 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.95% 98.95%
=======================================
Files 30 30
Lines 956 957 +1
=======================================
+ Hits 946 947 +1
Misses 10 10
Flag | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
unittests | 98.95% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) |
:arrow_up: |
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | |
---|---|---|
cytominer_eval/evaluate.py | 100.00% <ø> (ø) |
|
cytominer_eval/operations/precision_recall.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
cytominer_eval/tests/test_evaluate.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
|
...val/tests/test_operations/test_precision_recall.py | 100.00% <100.00%> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 779cea1...2f52623. Read the comment docs.
@gwaygenomics Ready for your review :)
@michaelbornholdt - can you resolve the merge conflict?
Also, I feel like @Flohu is better equipped to review this PR than me. @FloHu, given your insights in #62, do you have availability to review within Michael's requested time frame?
@FloHu. Everything is ready now.
Sorry for my late answer, things have been very busy. Sure, I'll review it, give me time until tomorrow, it's on my list. :)
@gwaygenomics please Merge :)
@FloHu
Everything seems to be correct and making the groupby explicit is definitely needed. I have to say that I still do not see how it solves the issue about counting twice vs. counting once (as discussed in the issue, see last comment) but I trust you on it. When I have some more time I can think into it further.
If you have unique groupings now, ie one group per sample. Then there will no bidirectional vertices since you are only looking at one node. If you group by several nodes, then yes we still have the counting twice thing
See issue #62 .