Closed taktv6 closed 4 months ago
Looks good so far. I like the new approach and would love to see it for interface metrics as well. In my opinion the naming of the interfacelabels package and its types do not fit any more. We can either rename it within this change to prevent using misleading naming in master (trade-off: more complex MR) or do the renaming prior to changing the interface description logic.
I'm happy to follow up today with a cleanup after we merge this.
Implementing support for dynamic labels from descriptions for BGP related metrics. This implementation does not use any state. Unlike the implementation of dynamic labels for interface descriptions. Shall I adjust the implementation for interface metrics too?