Closed vkrao100 closed 3 years ago
@d-kfmnn
In amulet2.0 I use a different ordering method than in amulet1.x Thanks again for the test case. I'll check out what causes the problems.
Best, Daniela
Hi,
indeed the new ordering in AMulet2 broke on your example, which is now fixed. Daniela
I was trying to run another test case with an internal node s-a-0. I see that amulet1.0 and amulet1.5 are able to generate the correct remainders in terms of primary inputs only. However, amulet2.0 generates a remainder in terms of non-primary inputs for the exact same test case.
Attached the test case (blif/aig)
4-bit-n18-sa-0.zip