Closed gusbrs closed 4 years ago
Hey @gusbrs
As always, thank you very much for your feedback!
the way it uses up to three universal-arguments, with two different behavior dimensions at play (repetition and direction) does put some cognitive load into calling it
Can't agree more! To be honest, the only times I use arguments - when I want to start rapid mode. Directions? I don't remember how it works.
hydra
I understand.
So I came up with a simpler flyspell-correct-wrapper, which takes up only one argument, and changes the direction with the argument. I'm using it in the form:
Thank you for sharing it :)
Can't agree more! To be honest, the only times I use arguments - when I want to start rapid mode. Directions? I don't remember how it works.
:-D
Well, thinking of it, this little function of mine is really just useful for those with the skip
binding of #58 . I'm afraid I might be the only one. So I'll close this and leave this here "for the record" and for the reference of the more curious. ;-)
I've been using
flyspell-correct-wrapper
as my main spell-checking interface for some time, and though I like it very much, the way it uses up to three universal-arguments, with two different behavior dimensions at play (repetition and direction) does put some cognitive load into calling it. And I admit I end up usually refraining from calling it with arguments for this reason.Since the inclusion of the ability to skip a word on demand, independently of having called
flyspell-correct-wrapper
with an argument (in https://github.com/d12frosted/flyspell-correct/issues/58#issuecomment-586598691), therapid-mode
became much less important to me. When I want do do a longer spell-checking session, I go to the hydra #69 instead.So I came up with a simpler
flyspell-correct-wrapper
, which takes up only one argument, and changes the direction with the argument. I'm using it in the form:which is, of course, just a simplified version of the current
wrapper
, and it does not enablerapid-mode
.A single binding, up to a single argument. And it solves 95% of my relevant cases, and for the other 5% I can fall-back to a more general command. The point, of course, is to reduce friction in the most common use case.
I'm still in the phase of "getting used to it", but I like it. And I thought it might also interest other users of
flyspell-correct
.