What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
As in #554 and #555, there is a persistent issue with the CRANIO module in that it appears that disk space is being exhausted. I am attempting some cleanup steps per the comments here.
I am pre-emptively updating to actions v4 which uses node 20 per the warning:
Purpose/implementation Section
What scientific question is your analysis addressing?
As in #554 and #555, there is a persistent issue with the CRANIO module in that it appears that disk space is being exhausted. I am attempting some cleanup steps per the comments here.
I am pre-emptively updating to actions v4 which uses node 20 per the warning:
What was your approach?
I remove all swap files, all old docker images, cache, unused packages prior to each analysis run.
What GitHub issue does your pull request address?
NA
Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.
Which areas should receive a particularly close look?
Is there anything that you want to discuss further?
Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?
Results
What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?
What is your summary of the results?
Reproducibility Checklist
Documentation Checklist
README
and it is up to date.analyses/README.md
and the entry is up to date.