Module contribution counts

[jharenza]

Purpose/implementation Section

What scientific question is your analysis addressing?

To come up with author order for this, adding a count contributions module

What was your approach?

What GitHub issue does your pull request address?

Directions for reviewers. Tell potential reviewers what kind of feedback you are soliciting.

Which areas should receive a particularly close look?

Is there anything that you want to discuss further?

Is the analysis in a mature enough form that the resulting figure(s) and/or table(s) are ready for review?

Results

What types of results are included (e.g., table, figure)?

What is your summary of the results?

Reproducibility Checklist

• [ ] The dependencies required to run the code in this pull request have been added to the project Dockerfile.
• [ ] This analysis has been added to continuous integration.

Documentation Checklist

• [ ] This analysis module has a README and it is up to date.
• [ ] This analysis is recorded in the table in analyses/README.md and the entry is up to date.
• [ ] The analytical code is documented and contains comments.

[rjcorb]

@jharenza I am getting one difference in total_contributions_clean.tsv after running locally:

< Jo Lynne Rokita   1015
---
> Jo Lynne Rokita   1013

(first count is local result)

[jharenza]

per slack convo with @rjcorb we each now got 1025 for total contributions for JLR, so will merge. Does not run in GHA.