Open Wanglei794 opened 8 months ago
sry.i deleted it as soon as I posted the comment.i ignore some details when i looked up the paper. and acc lower than your paper maybe cause i overlook label smoothing. sry again. nice writing, guy
---Original--- From: @.> Date: Wed, Jan 31, 2024 01:30 AM To: @.>; Cc: @.**@.>; Subject: Re: [d62lu/3DGTN] accuarcy (Issue #1)
Hi! Thanks for your interest. This paper is developed based on 3DCTN. Could you please tell me where you think the code is inconsistent with the description in the paper? Also, could you please show me your log file that has low accuracy?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
No worries. Feel free to discuss if you have any questions 👍 .
3dgtn_cls.txt my log file, I add the normal feature.got OA 93.30%. But its still the best res in various methods, Because running it on my device(4060Ti),Most of them do not achieve 93% OA
Great! You can use pre trained model showed in the git, it will make the result better~ 👍
em...,I am a rookie,Do you mean to use your best_model file? In this case, I'd better give up. Thank you for your answer
Hi! Thanks for your interest. This paper is developed based on 3DCTN. Could you please tell me where you think the code is inconsistent with the description in the paper? Also, could you please show me your log file that has low accuracy?