Closed dagewa closed 6 years ago
We define Rcomplete in the footnote, but not R1.
TODO add definition of R1 to the footnote
We already mention it in the footnote?:
[3]{$R\textrm{complete}$ is a robust validation method, especially in cases where the data completeness is limited, making use of all reflections \cite{Brunger1997}, and $R\textrm{work}$ is thus equivalent to $R1$. $R_\textrm{complete}$ was calculated with a 0.2\% test set size as described \cite{Luebben2015,Clabbers2017}.}
"$R1 = \frac{ \sum{(hkl)} \left| |F{obs}(hkl)| - |F{calc}(hkl)|\right| } { \sum{(hkl)} |F_{obs}(hkl)|} where the sum includes \emph{all} data." It is usually added as footnote to Table 1, but this practice is sometimes forgotten.