Closed tomhukins closed 4 years ago
Hi, Tom. I don't want to pick sides in the battle over suffix lists, and I'm very reluctant to recommend a modules that requires SSL support. I'm not going to accept this PR but I'll open a separate issue about more flexible suffix support.
Thanks for your review. I understand your decision and will be happy to review or discuss any alternative approach if that would help.
Coverage increased (+2.6%) to 91.813% when pulling f1029e2d77e94869e5f37e4cab0a9c1bb4229154 on tomhukins:support_io_socket_ssl_publicsuffix into 8e443ecb6f424e55c8a26c48557c32b7b2480204 on dagolden:master.