doesn't appear to guarantee this. I suspect the library assumes the user is manually closing the view and doesn't upset the offset in all or some cases. Adding manual resetting of offset allowed the use of Google Inbox like swipe-to-delete functionality:
Example listener with the new function:
swipeLayout.addSwipeListener(new SwipeLayout.SwipeListener() {
public void onStartOpen(SwipeLayout swipeLayout) {
}
@Override
public void onOpen(SwipeLayout swipeLayout) {
}
@Override
public void onStartClose(SwipeLayout swipeLayout) {
}
@Override
public void onClose(SwipeLayout swipeLayout) {
}
@Override
public void onUpdate(SwipeLayout swipeLayout, int i, int i2) {
}
@Override
public void onHandRelease(SwipeLayout swipeLayout, float xvel, float yvel) {
//If item is fully open commence delete action.
if (swipeLayout.getOpenStatus().equals(SwipeLayout.Status.Open)) {
Toast.makeText(context, "Item deleted", Toast.LENGTH_SHORT).show();
//Action to remove item here.
}
//If it is half open then close item, we don't want to delete unless the user
//scrolls all the way.
else if (swipeLayout.getOpenStatus().equals(SwipeLayout.Status.Middle)){
swipeLayout.close(true, true);
//Use resetOffsets to prevent bug
// where bottomView scrolls across the item
// more and more
// on each half-open-release event
swipeLayout.resetOffsets();
}
}
});
Of course if you have any idea how to duplicate this functionality without exposing the extra function then go for it or I can do it with guidance/time. I would have attempted this but I think it would have risked bugging out the "smooth" close function parameter .
Using
doesn't appear to guarantee this. I suspect the library assumes the user is manually closing the view and doesn't upset the offset in all or some cases. Adding manual resetting of offset allowed the use of Google Inbox like swipe-to-delete functionality:
Example listener with the new function:
Of course if you have any idea how to duplicate this functionality without exposing the extra function then go for it or I can do it with guidance/time. I would have attempted this but I think it would have risked bugging out the "smooth" close function parameter .