Open amitness opened 4 years ago
@amitness We are considering this, any suggestions on how we can better structure the repo if we were to go with paper_summaries
? My initial thought was to create folders and include a README in each one? So we would have separate folders for compuater_vision
, nlp
, etc for now? I was even considering having separate repos but could take a bit more effort to maintain, I like the concept of just having one repo.
In addition, we would need some help (domain expertise) to maintain the different domains, create the proper groupings, etc.
@omarsar Separate folders with dedicated README.md in each sounds like a good idea. We could also link them from the main README.md.
I agree with @omarsar on this! One repo sounds ideal but the main obstacle would be having the required domain expertise in order to find, accumulate and segregate papers from various domains
Note to self: Look into this issue a bit closer and come up with general structure.
@omarsar Thanks for starting this initiative.
I was wondering if we can expand this from
nlp_paper_summaries
topaper_summaries
instead and group papers by the domain: "NLP", "Computer Vision" etc. There is no existing platform that curates such paper summaries in one place and sopaper_summaries
could fill that gap. Just a thought.