Closed egli closed 8 months ago
Related to this is of course that all reserved class names should be fully documented.
On the subject of names, note that HTML does use cryptic names, such as p, tr, hr, li, to name a few. However, I do agree that our names should be recognisable to those who need them. An added complication is that not all braille codes have all the concepts needed for eBraille.
Thanks. I am going to make changes soon and will include this in the list as it is a minor change and makes a lot of sense. I will look out for similar issues. Part of my thinking about keeping class names short was just to help, in a very minor way, to keep the file size to a minimum. It ultimately won't make a great difference though and being clear is more important.
The common set of class names that is used to tag ebraille should include names that at least somewhat indicate their meaning.
In particular the class name
tn
is way to cryptic and should probably be replaced with something that relates what is used for, such as (why not)transcriber-note
, or evenbrl-transcriber-note
(see #144)